The Borderland Review

Government, reform and public life in Ukraine

Advertisement

« Home

What did 15 March 2022 show about Ukraine's wartime politics?

Posted: | Filed under: Politics | by Borderland staff

A look back at a day when allied leaders travelled to Kyiv, Ukraine's parliament lost a pro-Russian MP, and sanctions and aid shaped the diplomatic picture.

What did 15 March 2022 reveal about the political position of Ukraine, nearly three weeks into the Russian invasion? It was a day on which domestic politics, allied diplomacy and sanctions all moved at once, and the pattern across them is worth setting out.

Allies come to Kyiv

The most visible gesture was a journey by train. The prime ministers of Poland, Slovenia and the Czech Republic travelled to Kyiv to meet President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal. Their stated aim was to demonstrate the European Union's "unequivocal support" for Ukraine's sovereignty and independence. The visit placed three European heads of government physically in the capital of a country at war.

The same day, the United States added money to the political message. President Joe Biden signed a $1.5 trillion budget bill that included $13.6 billion in aid for Ukraine. The US Senate, for its part, unanimously passed a bipartisan resolution declaring Russian President Vladimir Putin a war criminal and calling for the International Criminal Court to investigate him.

Limits acknowledged

Against this backdrop of support, Zelenskyy acknowledged on 15 March 2022 that Ukraine would not be able to join NATO. Two days earlier, on 13 March, he had again called for a no-fly zone over Ukraine, warning that it was only a matter of time before Russian rockets fell on NATO territory. As later background describes it, NATO rejected Ukrainian requests for a no-fly zone in March 2022, and of its thirty members only the Baltic states voiced support for the idea.

Taken together, the two positions describe a narrowing of options: Kyiv was seeking security guarantees and military protection that the alliance was not prepared to provide, while allied governments expressed political backing and money instead.

On 13 March Zelenskyy also said that the purpose of the talks between the Russian and Ukrainian delegations was to bring about direct talks between himself and Putin. That aim framed negotiations as a route to the leaders' table rather than an end in themselves.

Parliament and the pro-Russian opposition

Inside Ukraine, the political landscape shifted too. Illia Kyva, a politician for the pro-Russian Opposition Platform — For Life, was deprived of his status as a member of the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine's parliament. A further four MPs quit the party. The day therefore recorded both an individual removal from parliament and a visible loss of members from a party associated with a pro-Russian line.

Sanctions and counter-sanctions

The sanctions war continued in both directions. The United States imposed additional sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. Russia answered earlier US sanctions on Russian officials by sanctioning Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, CIA Director William Burns and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. It also sanctioned Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly, General Wayne Eyre and most members of the Canadian parliament, all of whom were banned from entering Russia.

Pressure on the ground

The human cost of the war remained part of the political record in the days around 15 March. Ukraine's foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, said that Yevhen Matveyev, the mayor of Dniprorudne, had been abducted by Russian forces; this was reported on 13 March, the eighteenth day of the invasion.

What the day showed

The events of 15 March 2022 fit together as a snapshot of a state under attack but not isolated. European leaders came in person, Washington provided funds and a symbolic condemnation of Putin, and the sanctions exchange widened. At the same time, Kyiv publicly accepted that NATO membership was out of reach, and its parliament dealt with the fallout around a pro-Russian party. Support was real and visible, yet it stopped short of the military measures Ukraine's president had been requesting.


Related Posts

Advertisement
Advertisement